Buffer solution for electroporation and a method comprising the use of the same

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to a buffer solution for suspending animal or human cells and for dissolving biologically active molecules in order to introduce said biologically active molecules into the cells using an electric current and to a method for introducing biologically active molecules into animal or human cells using an electric current and a buffer solution. The inventive buffer solution has a buffering capacity of at least 20 mmol*I −1 *pH −1  and an ionic strength of at least 200 mmol* I −1  during a change to the pH value from pH 7 to pH 8 and at a temperature of 25 ° C. The use of a buffer solution of this type in the corresponding method allows biologically active molecules to be introduced into animal and human cells with a high degree of transfection efficiency and at the same time a low cell mortality. Different cell types, in particular dormant and actively dividing cells of low activity, can be successfully transfected in said buffer solution.

This application is a divisional application of U.S. Ser. No. 10/475,967, filed Jan. 8, 2004, which is a 371 application of PCT application No. PCT/DE02/01483, filed Apr. 23, 2002, which claims the priority of German application No. 101 20 000.5, filed Apr. 23, 2001, the contents of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety into the present application.

The invention relates to a buffer solution for suspending animal or human cells and for dissolving biologically active molecules in order to introduce said biologically active molecules into the cells using electric current and to a method for introducing biologically active molecules into animal or human cells using electric current comprising the use of the buffer solution.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The introduction of biologically active molecules, such as for example, DNA, RNA or proteins, into living cells is an important instrument for studying biological functions of these molecules. A preferred method for introducing foreign molecules into the cells is electroporation which, unlike other methods, only causes slight permanent changes to the biological structure of the target cell by the transfer reagents. During electroporation the foreign molecules are introduced into the cells from an aqueous solution by a brief current flow wherein the cell membrane is made permeable for the foreign molecules by the action of short electrical pulses. As a result of the “pores” briefly formed in the cell membrane, the biologically active molecules initially enter the cytoplasm in which they can already exert their function to be studied if necessary. In cases where DNA is introduced into eukaryotic cells, this must enter the cell nucleus however, so that it is possible for the genetic information to be expressed. In the case of dividing cells, this can take place during the cell division wherein the DNA passively enters the cell nucleus after the temporary dissolution of the nuclear membrane. In studies of quiescent or weakly dividing cells, for example, primary animal cells, however, the DNA does not enter into the cell nucleus in this way so that corresponding methods cannot be used here or at least are very tedious. Moreover, especially when DNA is introduced into animal cells, so-called transfection, particular problems frequently occur as a result of the lability of the cells, since the survival rate of the cells influences the efficiency of the transfection as an important parameter.

State of the art

In the past cell culture media (Anderson et al. (1991), J. Biochem. Biophys. Meth. 22, 207) or salt solutions buffered with phosphate or HEPES (Potter et al. (1984), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 7161; Fromm et al. (1985), Nature 319, 791) were frequently used to take up the animal cells and DNA molecules. However, non-buffered or weakly buffered mannitol or saccharose solutions were also used during the electroporation of animal cells (Shimizu et al. (1986), Med. Immunol. 11, 105; Riggs et al. (1986), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 5602). Such non-buffered or weakly buffered solutions have the disadvantage that their use leads to an increased cell mortality and significantly reduced transfection efficiency (Yan et al. (1998), BioTechniques 24, 590).

Yan et al. (1998) thus used a buffer solution for electroporation consisting of 100 mM HEPES, 137 mM NaCl, 4 mM Na₂HPO₄ and 6 mM dextrose. Smooth muscle cells from human aorta could certainly be successfully transfected in this buffer but the transfection efficiency was only 15% with a survival rate of only 10 to 20%. Furthermore, the buffer used by Yan et al., is only optimised for voltage pulses up to 500 V so that no indication is given as to whether this buffer can also be used for higher voltage pulses such as are required for the direct transfection into the cell nucleus. In any case, however, the transfection efficiencies achieved in this buffer are too low to meet higher demands.

In many cases, buffers having a low ionic strength and therefore low conductivity were used in order to avoid cell damage as a result of high currents which was observed when using buffer solutions having high conductivity, especially during the application of longer high-voltage pulses.

Friedrich et al., 1998 (Bioelectrochem. and Bioenerg. 47, 103) showed that the current flow during electroporation leads to a change in the pH in the vicinity of the electrodes as a result of electrolysis of the water. This change in the pH causes the release of cytotoxic Al³⁺ ions from the aluminium electrodes of the cuvettes and therefore causes increased cell mortality. The authors here propose a shortening of the pulse duration to increase the transfection efficiency. No information is given on any change to the buffer used.

Divalent cations such as Mg²⁺ for example, are frequently added to the electroporation buffer. Magnesium ions facilitate the binding of DNA to the surface of the cells and thereby bring about an increased transfection rate. However, this only seems to apply for Mg²⁺ concentrations up to 10 mM since at higher concentrations negative effects predominate, such as for example a reduction in the electrophoresis as a result of neutralisation of the charges of the DNA molecules or heating of the buffer as a result of an increase in the conductivity (Xie and Tsong (1993), Biophys. J. 65, 1684); Neumann et al. (1982), EMBO J. 1, 841; Klenchin et al. (1991), Biophys. J. 60, 804).

Furthermore, it was proposed that the buffer should be matched with regard to its composition to the intracellular conditions in order to increase the survival rate of the cells. Thus, a buffer having high potassium and low sodium concentrations corresponding to the cytoplasm should be used so as to prevent any collapse of the intracellular Na⁺/K⁺ ratio as a result of substance exchange via the pores formed in the cell membrane during the electroporation (van den Hoff et al. (1995), Methods in Mol. Biol. 48, Chapter 15, 185-197). However, a reduction in the transfection efficiency was detected for pulses having a field strength higher than 1300 V/cm.

All the buffer solutions described so far however have the disadvantage that the transfection efficiencies achieved when using them are relatively low and/or the buffers are not suitable for application during the electroporation of quiescent or weakly dividing cells.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The object of the invention is thus to provide a buffer solution for electroporation which makes it possible to achieve higher transfection efficiencies with a low cell mortality rate and to develop a corresponding method.

The object is solved by the buffer solution according to the invention having a buffer capacity of at least 20 mmol×I⁻¹×pH⁻¹ and an ionic strength of at least 200 mmol×I⁻¹ at a change in the pH from pH 7 to pH 8 and at a temperature of 25° C. With such a buffer solution it is possible to introduce biologically active molecules into animal or human cells by means of electroporation with transfection efficiencies up to 93% and at the same time with low cell mortality. Various cell types can be successfully transfected in this buffer, especially quiescent and weakly dividing cells. Moreover, by using the buffer solution it is possible to use high-voltage pulses having a field strength of at least 2000 V/cm, which allows DNA molecules to be transfected directly into the cell nucleus of primary animal and human cells. A decisive factor for the advantageous properties of the buffer according to the invention is the combination of a high buffer capacity with a high ionic strength. The buffer capacity β describes the quantity of a proteolyte required to change the pH of a buffer solution by one pH unit (β=dC×dpH⁻¹ where dC=added amount of acid or base and dpH=change in the pH). The ionic strength I of a solution can be calculated using the formula I=0.5 Σc_(i)×z_(i) ² (c_(i)=ion concentration in mol/I, z_(i)=ion charge). The “Java Buffer Calculator” program (Twigger & Beynon, 1998) was used to calculate the ionic strengths of the buffer substances given in this application. In this framework the buffer can be optimised in terms of its composition for the different cell types and requirements.

In a preferred embodiment it is provided that the buffer solution has a buffer capacity between 22 and 80 mmol×I⁻¹×pH⁻¹, preferably between 40 and 70 mmol×I⁻¹×pH⁻¹. With regard to the ionic strength a range between 200 and 500 mmol×I⁻¹, preferably between 250 and 400 mmol×I⁻¹ has been found to be particularly advantageous. In general, there is thus an optimum in relation to buffer capacity and ionic strength, depending on the cell type and the other experimental conditions, there being an interaction between these two parameters.

In another preferred embodiment it is provided that the buffer solution contains at least 10 mmol×I⁻¹ magnesium ions (Mg²⁺), preferably 15 to 20 mmol×I⁻¹ magnesium ions. Contrary to the findings so far, it has surprisingly been found that Mg²⁺ in the buffer according to the invention, even in fairly high concentrations, can bring about an increase in the transfection rate and to a significantly greater extent than could be explained by the simultaneous slight increase in the ionic strength. In this case, the buffer can contain magnesium chloride (MgCl₂) and/or magnesium sulphate (MgSO₄).

In an especially advantageous embodiment it is provided that the buffer according to the invention has a lower concentration of potassium ions (K⁺), preferably 2 to 6 mmol×I⁻¹ K⁺, and a higher concentration of sodium ions (Na⁺), preferably 100 to 150 mmol×I⁻¹ Na⁺, if compared with the cytoplasm of the cells. Thus, the buffer according to the invention is not matched to the intracellular Na⁺/K⁺ ratio but rather “extracellular” ratios are present in this respect. Surprisingly, however, this has no negative effects on the cells but nevertheless results in a significant increase in the transfection and cell survival rate.

It is advantageously provided that the buffer according to the invention contains HEPES and/or Na₂HPO4/NaH₂PO₄ as buffer substance. However, Tris/HCl or K₂HPO₄/KH₂PO₄ can also be used as buffer substances. Furthermore, the buffer may also contain additional components, for example, sodium chloride, sodium succinate, mannitol, glucose, sodium lactobionate and/or peptides.

Six groups of buffer systems, each optimised to different cell types, are mentioned below as examples for especially advantageous compositions of the buffer solutions according to the invention. However, other compositions are also possible within the scope of the invention so that these examples should not be understood as a restriction.

-   1) 4-6 mM KCl, 10-20 mM MgCl₂ and 120-160 mM Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (pH     7.2) -   2) 4-6 mM KCl, 10-20 mM MgCl₂, 5-25 mM HEPES and 120-160 mM     Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (pH 7.2) -   3) 4-6 mM KCl, 10-20 mM MgCl₂, 50-160 mM Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (pH 7.2)     and 5-100 mM sodium lactobionate or 5-100 mM mannitol or 5-100 mM     sodium succinate or 5-100 mM sodium chloride. -   4) 4-6 mM KCl, 10-20 mM MgCl₂, 5-25 mM HEPES, 50-160 mM     Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (pH 7.2) and 5-100 mM sodium lactobionate or 5-100     mM mannitol or 5-100 mM sodium succinate or 5-100 mM sodium     chloride. -   5) 4-6 mM KCl, 10-20 mM MgCl₂, 80-100 mM NaCl, 8-12 mM glucose,     0.3-0.5 mM Ca(NO₃)₂, 20-25 mM HEPES and 50-100 mM tris/HCl or 30-50     mM Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (pH 7.2) -   6) 0.1-3.0 mM MgCl₂, 50-200 mM K₂HPO₄/KH₂PO₄ (pH 6.5) and/or 1-50 mM     mannitol and/or 1-50 mM sodium succinate.

The object is furthermore solved by a method for introducing biologically active molecules into animal or human cells by means of electric current which comprises suspending the cells and dissolving the biologically active molecules in a buffer solution, which has a buffer capacity of at least 20 mmol×I⁻¹×pH⁻¹ and an ionic strength of at least 200 mmol* I⁻¹ with a change in the pH from pH 7 to pH 8 and at a temperature of 25° C., and applying an electric voltage to the suspension. With the aid of this method, biologically active molecules can be introduced into animal and human cells by means of electroporation with transfection efficiencies up to 93% and at the same time with low cell mortality. Various cell types, especially quiescent and weakly dividing cells can be successfully transfected.

Further advantageous developments of the method according to the invention with reference to the composition of the buffer solution are given in the dependent claims and can be deduced from the previous description.

The buffer solution according to the invention is especially suitable for carrying out an electroporation method in which biologically active molecules are introduced into the cells by a voltage pulse having a field strength of up to 2 to 10 kV×cm⁻¹ and a duration of 10 to 200 μs and a current density of at least 2 A×cm⁻². As a result of the high voltage pulse, it is possible for DNA to be transfected directly into the cell nucleus of animal and human cells with irreversible membrane damage being avoided by the shortness of the pulse. As a result of the shortness of the high-voltage pulse, the high ionic strength or conductivity of the buffer also does not result in any disadvantageous heating of the solution so that in addition to dividing cells, quiescent or weakly dividing cells can also be transfected with high efficiency and low mortality. The interaction of the high ionic strength of the buffer and short high-voltage pulses rather brings about efficient pore opening, wherein the strong buffer effect can also compensate for extreme fluctuations of the pH.

A current flow following said high-voltage pulse without interruption, having a current density of 2 to 14 A×cm⁻², preferably up to 5 A×cm⁻², and a duration of 1 to 100 ms, preferably up to 50 ms, can also be applied in a particularly advantageous fashion by using the buffer according to the invention in the method. The high buffer capacity of the buffer solution according to the invention reduces any change in the pH in the vicinity of the electrodes during the long-lasting second pulse, which contributes to the electrophoresis of the DNA, so that the cell mortality can be effectively reduced.

As a result of the method according to the invention, the transfection of biologically active molecules is thus optimised by means of the electric current in the cell nucleus of animal or human cells. In this case, nucleic acids, proteins or peptides can be introduced into quiescent or dividing animal or human cells with a high efficiency. The buffer solution according to the invention also favours the introduction of nucleic acids, proteins or peptides into primary cells by supporting high-voltage pulses.

The nucleic acids can also be present in the buffer solution in complexes or in compounds with peptides, proteins or other biologically active molecules.

The method according to the invention is especially suitable for the transfection of primary human blood cells, pluripotent precursor cells of human blood, primary human fibroblasts and endothelial cells, as well as muscle cells or melanocytes.

The cells produced by the method according to the invention are suitable in an especially advantageous fashion for diagnostic and/or analytical methods and for the production of pharmaceutical products for ex-vivo gene therapy.

Table 1 gives specific compositions of buffer solutions according to the invention which are each optimised for different applications or cell types and have proved to be especially advantageous with reference to high transfection efficiencies and reducing cell mortality. However, other compositions may also be understood within the scope of the invention so that these examples also should not be understood as restrictive.

Examples of application for individual buffer solutions are described in detail below with reference to the drawings.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is described in detail below with reference to the drawings.

In the figures

FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of the transfection efficiency and the survival rate for primary human endothelial cells as a function of the buffer capacity and the ionic strength of the buffer solution,

FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of the transfection efficiency and the survival rate for primary human lymphocytes as a function of the buffer capacity and ionic strength of the buffer solution,

FIG. 3 shows a flow-cytometric analysis of primary human fibroblasts transfected with H-2K^(k) expression vector during which the cells were incubated with a Cy5-coupled anti-H-2K^(k) antibody and analysed using a flow cytometer (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson) (FL-1, FL-2, FL-3=fluorescence channel 1, 2, 3; SSC=sideward scatter, FSC=forward scatter),

FIG. 4 shows a flow-cytometric analysis of human smooth muscle cells transfected with H-2K^(k) expression vector during which the cells were incubated with a Cy5-coupled anti-H-2K^(k) antibody and anaysed using a flow cytometer (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson) (FL-1, FL-2, FL-3=fluorescence channel 1, 2, 3; SSC=sideward scatter, FSC=forward scatter),

FIG. 5 shows a flow cytometric analysis of primary human melanocytes transfected with the GFP expression vector during which the cells were analysed using a flow cytometer (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson) (FL-2, FL-3, FL-4=fluorescence channel 2, 3, 4; SSC=sideward scatter, FSC=forward scatter), and

FIG. 6 shows a flow cytometric analysis of the human CML cell line K562 transfected with the GFP expression vector during which the cells were analysed using a flow cytometer (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson) (FL-2, FL-3, FL-4=fluorescence channel 2, 3, 4; SSC=sideward scatter, FSC=forward scatter).

EXAMPLES

The following examples illustrate the invention but should not be regarded as restrictive.

Example 1

Transfection Efficiency and Survival rate of Primary Human Endothelial Cells

In order to study the transfection and survival rate of cells during electrotransfection as a function of the buffer capacity and the ionic strength, primary human endothelial cells were transfected with a vector coding for the heavy chain of the mouse MHC class 1 protein H-2K^(k).

Respectively 7×10⁵ cells with respectively 5 μg vector DNA and the respective electrotransfection buffer were placed at room temperature in a cuvette having an interelectrode gap of 2 mm and transfected by a 1000 V pulse of 100 μs duration. In addition, comparative values were determined using PBS (Phosphate Buffered Saline: 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2+137 mM NaCl, ionic strength=161.5 mM, buffer capacity=4.8 mM/pH). Directly after the electrotransfection the cells were washed out of the cuvette using 400 μl of culture medium, incubated for 10 minutes at 37° C. and then transferred to a culture dish with pre-heated medium. After incubating for 6 h, the cells were incubated with a Cy5-coupled anti-H-2K^(k)-antibody and analysed using a flow cytometer (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson). As can be seen from FIG. 1, both the transfection efficiencies and the survival rates increase with increasing buffer capacity and ionic strength. In each case significantly better values could be achieved compared with the PBS comparative solution in which an extremely high mortality rate occurred. In some buffer solutions the mortality rate was so high that these values could not be evaluated statistically.

Example 2

Transfection Efficiency and Survival Rate of Primary Human Lymphocytes

Furthermore, the transfection and survival rate of primary human lymphocytes during electrotransfection was studied as a function of the buffer capacity and the ionic strength.

For this purpose respectively 5×10⁶ cells with respectively 5 μg H-2K^(k)-expression vector-DNA in the respective buffers were placed at room temperature in a cuvette having a 2 mm interelectrode gap and electrotransfected by a 1000 V, 100 μs pulse followed by a current flow having a current density of 4 A×cm⁻² and 40 ms. In addition, comparative values were determined using PBS (ionic strength=161.5 mM, buffer capacity=4.8 mM/PH). The analysis was made after 16 hours. As can be seen from FIG. 2, it is clear that the survival rates of the cells increase as the buffer capacity and ionic strength of the buffer solutions used increases. In some cases significantly better values could be achieved compared with the comparative solution (PBS: 40.1% transfected cells 38.3% living cells). Here also the transfection efficiency can thus be increased significantly by the choice of suitable buffer solution according to the invention compared with conventional solutions, such as medium or PBS for example.

Example 3

Transfection of Primary Human Fibroblasts

FIG. 3 shows a FACScan analysis of primary human fibroblasts transfected with H-2K^(k) expression vector. 5×10⁵ cells with 5 μg vector DNA in buffer 6 from Table 1 were placed at room temperature in a cuvette having a 2 mm interelectrode gap and transfected by a 1000 V, 100 μs pulse followed by a current flow of 6 A×cm⁻² and 33 ms. After incubating for 5 h, the cells were incubated with a Cy5-coupled anti-H-2K^(k) antibody and analysed using a flow cytometer (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson). The number of dead cells was determined by staining with propidium iodide. 93% of the living cells expressed the H-2K^(k) antigen which corresponds to a very high transfection efficiency.

Example 4

Transfection of Human Smooth Muscle Cells

FIG. 4 shows a FACScan analysis of human smooth muscle cells transfected with H-2K^(k) expression vector. 5×10⁵ cells with 5 μg vector DNA in buffer 6 from Table 1 were placed at room temperature in a cuvette having a 2 mm interelectrode gap and transfected by a 1000 V, 100 μs pulse followed by a current flow having a current density of 5,6 A×cm⁻² and 40 ms. After incubating for 13.5 h the cells were incubated using a Cy5-coupled anti-H-2K^(k) antibody and analysed using a flow cytometer (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson). The number of dead cells was determined by staining with propidium iodide. 53.8% of the living cells expressed the H-2K^(k) antigen which also corresponds to a high transfection efficiency.

Example 5

Transfection of Primary Human Melanocytes

FIG. 5 shows a FACScan analysis of primary human melanocytes which were transfected with GFP expression vector. 5×10⁵ cells with 5 μg pEGFP-C1 vector (Clontech Lab.) in buffer 40 from Table 1 were placed at room temperature in a cuvette having a 2 mm interelectrode gap and transfected by a 1000 V, 100 μs pulse followed by a current flow having a current density of 6 A×cm⁻² and 33 ms. After incubating for 24 h the cells were analysed using a flow cytometer (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson). The number of dead cells was determined by staining with propidium iodide. 56.2% of the living cells expressed the GFP which also corresponds to a very high transfection efficiency.

Example 6

Transfection of Human CML Cell Line K562

FIG. 6 shows a FACScan analysis of the human CML cell line K562 which was transfected with GFP expression vector. 5×10⁵ cells with 5 μg pEGFP-C1 vector (Clontech Lab.) in buffer 42 from Table 1 were placed at room temperature in a cuvette having a 2 mm interelectrode gap and transfected by a 1000 V, 70 μs pulse followed by a current flow having a current density of 4 A×cm⁻² and 10 ms. After incubating for 24 h the cells were analysed using a flow cytometer (FAC-Scalibur, Becton Dickinson). The number of dead cells was determined by staining with propidium iodide. 77.7% of the living cells expressed the GFP which also corresponds to a very high transfection efficiency.

List of Abbreviations Used

The following abbreviations were used in addition to those commonly used in Duden:

-   A Ampere -   APC Allphycocyanin -   CD Cluster of differentiation -   cm Centimeter -   DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid -   FACScan Fluorescence activated cell scanning -   FCS Foetal calf serum -   FL Fluorescence -   FSC Forward scatter -   HEPES N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazine-N′-(2-ethanesulphonic acid) -   ml Millilitre -   mM Millimolar -   msec Millisecond -   PBS Phosphate buffered saline -   PE Phycoerythrin -   PerCP Peridinin chlorophyll protein -   pH negative common logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration -   RNA Ribonucleic acid -   RPMI Rosewell Park Memorial Institute -   SSC Sideward scatter -   Tris Tris-(hydroxymethyl)-aminoethane-hydrochloride -   μg Microgram -   μl Microlitre -   μsec Microsecond -   V Volt 

1-17. (canceled)
 18. A method for introducing biologically active molecules into animal or human cells by means of electric current, comprising: i. suspending the cells and dissolving the biologically active molecules in a buffer solution which has a buffer capacity of at least 20 mmol×1⁻¹×pH⁻¹ and an ionic strength of at least 200 mmol×1⁻¹ at a change in the pH from pH 7 to pH 8 and at a temperature of 25° C. to form a suspension, and ii. applying an electric voltage to the suspension so as to introduce said biologically active molecules into animal or human cells.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution has a buffer capacity between 22 and 80 mmol×1⁻¹×pH⁻¹.
 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution has a buffer capacity between 40 and 70 mmol×1⁻¹×pH⁻¹.
 21. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution has an ionic strength between 200 and 500 mmol×1⁻¹.
 22. The method claim 18, wherein the buffer solution has an ionic strength between 250 and 400 mmol×1⁻¹.
 23. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution contains at least 10 mmol×1⁻¹ magnesium ions (Mg²⁺).
 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the buffer solution contains 15 to 20 mmol×1⁻¹ magnesium ions.
 25. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution contains magnesium chloride (MgCl₂) and/or magnesium sulphate (MgSO₄).
 26. The method of claims 18, wherein the buffer solution contains a lower concentration of potassium ions (K⁺), preferably 2 to 6 mmol×1⁻¹ K⁺, and a higher concentration of sodium ions (Na⁺), preferably 100 to 150 mmol×1⁻¹ Na⁺, if compared with the cytoplasm of the cells.
 27. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution contains HEPES and/or Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ and/or Tris/HCl and/or K₂HPO₄/KH₂PO₄.
 28. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution contains a compound selected from the group consisting of sodium chloride, sodium succinate, mannitol, glucose, sodium lactobionate and/or peptides.
 29. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution contains 4-6 mM KCl, 10-20 mM MgCl₂ and 120-160 mM Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (at a pH of about at least 7.2).
 30. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution contains 4-6 mM KCl, 10-20 mM MgCl₂, 5-25 mM HEPES and 120-160 mM Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (at a pH of about at least 7.2).
 31. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution contains 4-6 mM KCl, 10-20 mM MgCl₂, 50-160 mM Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (at a pH of about at least 7.2) and 5-100 mM sodium lactobionate or 5-100 mM mannitol or 5-100 mM sodium succinate or 5-100 mM sodium chloride.
 32. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution contains 4-6 mM KCl, 10-20 mM MgCl₂, 5-25 mM HEPES, 50-160 mM Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (at a pH of about at least 7.2) and 5-100 mM sodium lactobionate or 5-100 mM mannitol or 5-100 mM sodium succinate or 5-100 mM sodium chloride.
 33. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution contains 4-6 mM KCl, 10-20 mM MgCl₂, 80-100 mM NaCl, 8-12 mM glucose, 0.3-0.5 mM Ca(NO₃)₂, 20-25 mM HEPES and 50-100 mM tris/HCl or 30-50 mM Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (at a pH of about at least 7.2).
 34. The method of claim 18, wherein the buffer solution contains 0.1-3.0 mM MgCl₂, 50-200 mM K₂HPO₄/KH₂PO₄ (at a pH of about at least 6.5) and/or 1-50 mM mannitol and/or 1-50 mM sodium succinate.
 35. The method of claim 18, wherein the introduction of the biologically active molecules into the cells is achieved by a voltage pulse having a field strength of up to 2 to 10 kV×cm⁻¹ and a duration of 10 to 200 μs and a current density of at least 2 A×cm⁻².
 36. The method of claim 35, wherein the introduction of the biologically active molecules into the cells is achieved by a current flow following said high-voltage pulse without interruption, having a current density of 2 to 14 A×cm⁻², preferably up to 5 A×cm ⁻², and a duration of 1 to 100 ms, preferably up to 50 ms.
 37. The method of claim 35, wherein the biologically active molecules are transfected into the cell nucleus of animal or human cells by means of electric current.
 38. The method of claim 18, wherein nucleic acids, proteins or peptides are introduced into quiescent or dividing animal or human cells.
 39. The method of claim 18, wherein nucleic acids, proteins or peptides are introduced into primary animal or human cells.
 40. The method of claim 38, wherein the nucleic acids are present in complexes or in compounds with peptides, proteins or other biologically active molecules.
 41. The method of claim 18, wherein the cells are selected from the group consisting of primary human blood cells, pluripotent precursor cells of human blood, primary human fibroblasts and endothelial cells, as muscle cells and melanocytes. 42-43. (canceled) 